Asked what last weekend by the very relevant (use a semi-sarcastic tone) VAT journalists know what she thought of the movement Legault-Sirois, former Transport Minister Julie fallen "boots cowboy "Ball said of the touch sensitivity in a burst of deep intellectual and scholarly analysis sought (read sarcastically):" We must remember that it is a separatist. "
Well, we did not know that the former Liberal Charles Sirois was a nasty separatist power but hey, we is not an intellectual shortcut near the PLQ. Looks like my old philosophy teacher in Cegep, arguments are like paintings, there are thicker than others.
This "incident", flatulence among a mountain of manure you say, demonstrates how the level of public debate down another notch to the PLQ, the more that this is the party that still entitled to more than two years in power according to our present democratic rules (that will be agreed in the book of man and woman in the world, we speak more than 21 months to 33 months in power as to do the remaining four years and not five years as John wants "I have five years 2 hands on the wheel" Charest). We realize that every time, unfortunately many people think they have reached the shallows, they always manage to consistently lower the bar of their record of mediocrity.
And come to think, is that the former Liberal minister has the guts to call his colleague, Finance of the same name? Raymond Bachand that I know, is a former PQ, right? And the Minister of Education who voted yes in 1995, Lyne Beauchamp? And what about the recent appointments of former PQ? Diane Lemieux Construction and Lucien Bouchard in shale gas well that intention to appoint Serge Menard Single anti-collusion that wants to found the Liberal Party as a substitute and if he could escape a public inquiry on the field construction and fraud and embezzlement in the same field. It's funny when it comes to construction, we are ready to throw billions from the windows but when it is the Crown Prosecutors who want to approach the Canadian average, it is stingy as Scrooge.
So in conclusion, before you go to an outdated argument worthy of Lysianne Gagnon, Alain Dubuc and André Pratte of this world, the former transport minister replaced by Sam Hammad should just moderate his transports and look carefully within his own party to identify and point fingers all those who directly or far have flirted with the sovereignty movement and take the opportunity to throw them at the door and make a great purge anti-sovereignty within the PLQ. I think there would be enough heads that would roll the PLQ might lose his precious majority of four members.
Or is it that there are two weights, two measures to the PLQ, the separatists in the party are ok, but others do not deserve discuss the idea with PLQ but deserve to be pointing the finger by having to deal with all the jokes. Is this the debate idea is to have the PLQ with Quebecers?
Greetings Boulieris,
Tym Machine
Thanks for your comment, check back often! Thanks for your comment, come back soon! 
0 comments:
Post a Comment