relevant link:
http://www.cyberpresse.ca/actualites/quebec-canada/politique-quebecoise/201102/24/01-4373700-colisee-quebec-se-garde-une-option-pour -reevaluate-the-projet.php? utm_categorieinterne trafficdrivers = & = utm_contenuinterne cyberpresse_les-most-popular-title_article_ECRAN1POS5
I said it before and I still think if JJ Charest led with 80% of voting intentions in the region Quebec, the coliseum how could he have? The answer to My humble opinion is: zero plus a big bar inside. This is what happens in politics when you're taken for granted: the politicians in power do not give you anything, they'll shit in your hands and you openly laugh in the face. (As for the Conservatives at the federal level, the strategy is different, they have deliberately chosen to win the next election without Quebec.)
Charest If JJ wanted to make a coliseum or subway cars to please his electorate natural and faithful, he would have done these projects in Westmount, Darcy McGee or St. Lawrence in cities like Kirkland, Baie d'Urfe, St-Laurent and Westmount. At worst go, he would mounted in Shawville from one in the end there. However, in politics, everything is done by opportunism and Charest PLQ is the archetype of opportunism.
But there is a premise for political expediency: capitalize on ignorance and crass stupidity of people and hope they do not know what the left hand is doing while the right stirs in your face. In the case of Charest, the benefit of the doubt is long since past and we know exactly what Charest did. The more we fall asleep, the less follow the policy, the less the better participate in the final results. In the West Island, 60% or more, we vote Liberal or they abstain from voting.
The funniest in this particular case, it is total and constant improvisation of this government. They agonize us and we will make it very insecure because of their incompetence in all matters they touch. They can change their mind dozens of times in the space of a few months. A (e) as (it) is not the case, you hop on (the) fired. A state license to kid does not work, check to hop a friendly firms. The case is known, hop, we say we will no longer check. One day, we monitor spending, the other is wasted and squandered the money Taxpayers with every wind. One constant: the core of key players remain the same and must remain the same, it sends the new "bat" to believe in change and throw dust in the eyes while you carefully and jealously guard the status quo because during that time, friends and pocketing pocketing big. They think we do skin continuously and shamelessly, they will realize that sometimes reaches a point of no return and that even the most blindly loyal constituencies.
The Charest government is acting with his constituents as a Don Juan acts with his wife, with little recognition and contempt for those remaining faithful to the position. The greatest gifts we offer them our flirtations, they must coax, tame them, put them in our pocket, as one is a bit clumsy and aunt of nature is done with the only thing we know: the christi Nanan we indebted ourselves, our children and grandchildren and great-grandchildren noseam ad.
It is nevertheless important to NEVER put the system in question. When questioned, it diverts attention. Democracy is in Danger: bam, a Nanan, there is corruption and collusion in construction, ottoman, Nanane biggest yet. When the patient vomited because he nanana has ate too much, he made a show of Bastarache Butt as the Committee to make him believe that intends to change the system (yes, the intention but the intention to change it for worst question to evict the objectivity and impartiality and replace it with supporters and friends filled the nose around the affairs of the state). By cons, if there are contracts to give to friends of the party, there is obviously nothing too good or too expensive.
But this sudden "reconsideration" sudden these "flats" would they because despite the fact that we make the news in French as the new go to the English media even when the West Island and although the victories are assured in these counties, it could be dangerous or risky to raise questions among some sections of the population sleeping gas in fraudulent practices which are woven in PLQ? It can sometimes be risky to awaken people sleeping, do not we say that we must be wary of standing water?
Does this also would be in the same vein as what happens with prosecutors, there is nothing to gain in terms of votes and gains in counties that carefully reconsider the "verséees increases?
You will say, yes, but they give unions and other bureaucratic organs by cons: correct but in this case, it is not to cast it to quiet popular discontent. Everything is made and designed to put people to sleep for PLQ gas. Look at the men PLQ all very drab, dull, dull, lifeless, monotonous. Everything to be erased, the game play very very low profile and certainly, perhaps because in the end.
The bottom line is ask yourself this question: would you give the keys to your store to Sam for Hammad there manages your marketing staff? Would you let your Michele Courschesne children? Would you let Jean Charest manage your plant's nails? If you answered no to all these questions then tell me why the devil if you refuse to personally manage their few thousand dollars in your name why you let them manage the billions of dollars of expenditure in the province? Intentionally
yours
Tym Machine
Thanks for your comment, check back often! Thanks for your comment, come back soon! 
0 comments:
Post a Comment