Before getting into the thick of things, let me tell you a story from a movie I had seen there about a decade and is the film "The Suckers " or translated into French by "crossers". This is not a film for the faint hearted and some racist remarks in the film (a black man who laughs at the Indians while the guy is Arab-Muslim and a boss who makes racist jokes n *****) risk shock to many or yellow make you laugh. Nevertheless, there is a sequence that is essential to remember from this movie and everything happens at the beginning especially, but also throughout the fim except the end which turns into dramatic action film series B. In this sequence, there is a seller of used cars sitting in his office with a potential buyer who seems very interested in a car XYZ data. The seller raises the potential buyer's trick question: "What is the maximum you could put on this car? And why this question is it a trick question will you tell me? What you can be naive ... the salesman will never drop below the maximum you just tell him, why would he? If you tell him, the most I can make is $ 20 000, it comes from knowing that you could afford to put $ 20 000. In fact, this $ 20 000 which is your maximum amount to be its floor price that will set in the negotiation that will lead with passion and verve by standing by the small package.
Similarly ideas, I find that the tandem-Charest Labeaume made figure of poor negotiator on the issue of whether they want private coliseum with Pierre-Karl Peladeau and other potential private investors in this world and I would add even vis-à- vis the federal government. Yet this is not the first time they are told. They just tell us that the city of Quebec and the province of Quebec would share the cost of an amphitheater 50-50 up to a maximum of 200 million. When I began my story earlier, you're probably wondering where I am went with my skis in the bathroom, right? Are you starting to understand where I'm going in this story? The question that kills Labeaume Charest, Hammad and company is: "Why the hell is it that Pierre-Karl Peladeau or any other potential investor or even the federal government would put a big red cent in any case when the provincial and municipal come to declare in unison that if nobody else shows up, they would both share the bill?
At first I thought the strategy of the Federal chick stingy or "cheap shot" especially given that the Quebecois in Quebec City were the only region to vote Conservative MASSIVELY last two federal elections, thank you to radio stations in Quebec City and more. But as time passed, I discovered that this was the strategy to get as many private as possible in the issue of financing of the new amphitheater in the city of Quebec. They would, in my humble opinion of expanding a small envelope of 20 million dollars and some (or even style double donations I have my place to encourage even more strongly the people of Quebec I have to subscribe to my place to give gifts to the foundation I have my place and get tickets in the said arena but otherwise the fact that they leave open the suspense has led many business to display their colors in the region Quebec and to show their keen interest in building a modern amphitheater and multi-functional in Quebec City to replace the outdated Pepsi Coliseum has more than 49 years (previously the mayor of St-Augustin-des- Moors, which offers a field of his city for the construction of the amphitheater, he had to do anyway). In itself, even if it was not perfect and rather awkward at times (remember the famous photo taken with the group of Conservative members donning the jersey of the Nordiques a few days before the march blue), the conservative strategy has reported far more dividends in terms of contribution possible that private advocated by the tandem-Labeaume Charest.
Then two things will happen in the way of approaching things the tandem Labeaume Charest-folder of the new coliseum and announcements that took place in the morning about the current financial arrangements for the new coliseum. To say as did Jean Charest that the doors of private and federal remained open but anyway the bill would be fully covered if they were not there really shows how weak and pathetic that the province has to negotiate. As shown previously, it does NOT the maximum loan to be invested when you want to buy something . We can talk to a minimum and even go to the very minimum, but very ridiculous as saying that we will all pay if nobody else shows up to pay the face is farcical and amateurism in the most total negotiations. On the other hand, one could read by cons, a planned strategy for the coliseum is 100% public and has always wanted Regis Labeaume and the fact of saying, "Hey, other people, we are investing and you? "Would fall more blackmail than a real desire that the federal government or the private sector is manifested in order to create an illusion of the screen when their question is asked:" And the private sector? Federal and in all this? . They may say "they are called, the door was open" by failing to specify the second part cons of affirmation.
Speaking of private, according to sources Dominic Maurais the issue Maurais live Choi Radio X, the supply of PKP for funding the coliseum was yet around 70 million plus $ 1 million per year for 20 years for the name of the coliseum. The killer question that I ask Labeaume chief negotiator of the city of Quebec and Quebec City Mayor: "Where is the investment promised by Quebecor in the financial exactly? "Let's be realistic
two seconds. Yet I was one of the first to get carried away by the participation of the provincial 45% even if everybody knows that Charest and his band inspire PLQ since he has both hands on the wheel and by hand in our wallets. I now realize that the promise to invest was good but perhaps too high given the financial means and capacity to pay Quebecois. Now that those who tried to make me cry crocodile tears when speaking of health and education go get dressed because they are far from rhetorical move me knowing that the private sector can play a much more prominent in these areas and that unfortunately does not or definitely not up to what should be done besides sports and shows can be seen by some as a great contribution to health and education of people whining for so cheap, could use some work in a pinch. However, when I see attorneys justice on strike and I discuss their demands as legitimate and, as minarchiste, statism most viable and most essential to a company that even many advocating capitalism and free market, it is the system of justice which must be adequate and paid accordingly high critical skills that we bring these people can make to society and in which we live, I say yes, then it picks me up and then I tell myself that there is a serious problem. Would it not then a question to ask in priorities and ask ourselves: the professional hockey and shows Lady Gaga and Co., it's great and very good trainer for youth (not get me wrong, big fan of Lady Gaga and the Nordiques, I think really and truly), however, the justice system and prosecutors prevail and we can not pay with money unlike private health and education. So is there no way to quantify what the union calls Crown prosecutors in the Quebec provincial government and give them much more than the 9% increase in Advanced leaves fetch 200 million in this that I consider noble and important (unlike the very cheap $ 100 000 given to the tsunami New Guinea for 4 years ago and shot to Haiti and Co.) but if you "chop" a small scratch in the 200 million have 20 million or 30 million maximum (I duplicate my place, walk the talk as they say), we ask another 30 million to 50 million with the federal law and that the Péladeau pays the rest to have a beautiful brand new coliseum 200 million and dust, we could build a super nice coliseum for that price and could easily fill the gaps in our justice system not to mention that if we had called the public inquiry, it would surely save a sudden 20-30 % of each invoice which is traded under construction Quebec.
But the worst part of the investment of Jean Charest (who does not have his notes I have from my place in the last I heard, correct me if I'm wrong) is that many liberals n 'have nothing to polish the coliseum and prefers to invest in education and health (to say with a stuffy nose and pinched the voice naziarde to Charest) not to mention all the other patent, trade unionists and left gau Réjean Parent of this world. The PLQ think he really buy votes in Quebec City as popular as the theme itself of the new amphitheater and the Quebec Nordiques? Think he save these seats will certainly be seriously threatened primarily by the ADQ (or the new party of François Legault comes a day if the world)? How do they feel the county who vote at 90% or more for a liberal candidate when they announced that there will be little or nothing for them while we give any wind to go attempt to "salvage" in "at-risk counties"? Respect for his loyal electoral base you have already said or guedounage shameless, shameless and shamelessly attempt to attract the votes of customers and unpredictable unfaithful. When I said that anglophones and allophones were very poorly served by the PLQ, here is another fine example to be included in your little book of notes after the contract was awarded to Bombardier in La Pocatière just before the partial-Kamouraska Témiscouata.
If francophones think they need a new party varies from center to left-right lucid and pragmatic Frankie Legault while a renovated ADQ would do nicely, and even more, especially since our friends Anglophone and allophone need a new party Equality will better represent them and who will work for them, their rights and demands while the PLQ his county merely to "pass the guitar" and take them for granted.
maximum Greetings,
Tym Machine
Thanks for your comment, check back often! Thanks for your comment, come back soon! 
0 comments:
Post a Comment